ABSTRACT
Today Anesthesiologists occasionally face with bradycardia during gastric surgery and recognized this phenomenon as a vagal reflex. The objective of this study is finding of anesthesia risk factors for bradycardia and prevention of its hazardous complications during gastric surgeries. In this retrospective study, fifty patients undergoing laparatomy and gastric surgery in Sina hospital between September 2009 to September 2013. They had been anesthetized with propofol or thiopental and their maintenance was kept by isoflurane or propofol were enrolled. The age, gender, underlying diseases, drug history, chemotherapy, kind of surgery, heart rate variability, onset time of bradycardia and its complication during a period of four years was noted. Of Fifty patients, 31 males and 19 females was enrolled in this study. The mean age of patients was 48 +/- 8.3 yr; all patients had laparatomy under general anesthesia. The kind of surgery were mainly gasterectomy and gastrojejunostomy. The mean onset of episode bradycardia was 24.5 +/- 3.5 min after initiation of surgery incision, and most of the bradycardia was mild to moderate [47 patients] that with injection of atropine it resolved. There was no relationships between anesthetic drugs and anesthetic maintenance, age, gender, and incidence of bradycardia event during the surgery. The risk factors of bradycardia were, diabetes mellitus in seven patients, use of beta blockers in 17 patients in perioperative period and gastric cancer and chemotherapy [neoadjuant therapy] in three patients that lead to asystole, they were not response to standard treatment during surgery and lead to death. The history of gastric cancer and previous chemotherapy might be the only common factors that cause to bradycardia and irresponsible asystole during gastric surgery in these patients. It seems that only close monitoring and vigilant anesthesiologist require for treatment and prevention from adverse effect of such a sever bradycardia event
ABSTRACT
Combinations of hypnotics with or without opiates are commonly used in agitated patients. We hypothesized that combination of haloperidol-propofol in comparison with midazolam-propofol would lower consumption of propofol and lead to better hemodynamic and respiratory profile during sedation of agitated patients. Among 108 patients admitted in our ICU, 60 patients were agitated according to Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) and randomly divided into two groups. Morphine sulfate (0.05 mg/kg) was administered to all patients for relief of postoperative pain. In one group, sedative infusion was started with 1 mg/h of haloperidol plus 25 μg/kg/min of propofol after bolus injection of 2 mg haloperidol. In the other group, midazolam1 mg/h and propofol 25 μg/kg/min were infused after a bolus injection of 2 mg midazolam. Propofol infusion was adjusted to keep bi-spectral index between 61-80 and the RSS between 3-5. Hourly propofol consumption was recorded during 24 h of sedation and compared statistically. We also compared SpO 2 , arterial blood gas variables, hemodynamic parameters and episodes of respiratory depression (SpO 2 ≤85%) requiring respiratory support between the groups. Haloperidol, when added to propofol infusion, decreased its consumption at all the measured times (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in hemodynamic variables between two groups, but the episodes of respiratory depression was significantly higher in propofol-midazolam group (P = 0.02). We conclude that haloperidol-propofol infusion decreases propofol requirements in the agitated patients. Besides, this combination showed a better profile in terms of occurrence of respiratory depression.